A Resource For the People of New Hampshire in the Divorce Process.
Here, get details of Judicial Divergence, Family Law Strategy, or behaviors used to help prepare you for family law cases.
Confession and Cover Up
Sealing Evidence in the New Hampshire Court System
Please recall that this was a real New Hampshire Family Law case and these were the case numbers: the NH Supreme Court case number, 2023-0029 and the original case number, 659-2020-DM-00505 Please also recall that court documents were submitted to the NH Family Court showing that adults involved my daughter in the divorce without my knowledge or consent.
The NH Supreme Court has since affirmed the lower court's ruling.
So now the effort to erase the evidence has begun.
The first attempt was made by the petitioner to have the court force NHJudicialWatch.org to remove the evidence from the website. A motion was filed with the court and the argument was made to have the evidence removed. Fortunately the court denied this motion.
The second attempt was made by my daughter to try and have NHJudicialWatch.org remove the evidence from the website. A motion was filed by my daughter with the court to intervene in the divorce case and the argument was made to have the evidence removed. In filing this motion however, a confession was provided showing what was really going on with my daughter. In the motion to intervene, it states that the original plan and agreement was to have my daughter be involved in the divorce without my knowledge and then to have the evidence suppressed. This is the deal adults made with a child. Then they broke the deal with the child and did not suppress the evidence. This is what has been confessed to. The court also denied this motion. The confession however remains. Please see a copy of the motion with the confession below.
Now the petitioner has filed a motion to have the evidence sealed 3 years after it was introduced to the court. It is now with the New Hampshire court system. So after making a deal with my daughter, the adults are looking to suppress the evidence. If the evidence is sealed, anyone researching this family law case would not be privy to how the adults were allowed to involve a child to gain leverage in the case. Other cases could be affected without the benefit of knowing what was done or the same blueprint can be used to involve other children.
Please be advised that this is what's going on in our New Hampshire court system. Please be aware of this so this does not happen to you, any of your loved ones, or your children.
Below, please find the document showing the motion filed in order to remove the evidence from NH judicial watch.org website. It is very important for them to make sure that this information is not available for everyone to see.
Please pass this information along to anyone who may be going through the family law court system in New Hampshire.
NH Child Impact Law Loophole
The Loophole Used in a NH Divorce
December 17, 2023
To Whom it may concern,
I am in the middle of a divorce case that is now before the NH Supreme Court, 2023-0029. This is a real case. The original case number was 659-2020-DM-00505. I am the respondent. As part of the divorce, everyone in NH is required to take a Child Impact class by law, which I did. The purpose of this class is to inform parents about how a divorce can impact children and to teach parents how to lessen the effects of a divorce and make sure the children are not pulled or manipulated. This class was designed to shield children from what can be the ugly dynamics of a divorce situation between parents.
Normally, parents are required to adhere to these rules. But I would like to tell you about a loophole that was used in the divorce process.
Our temporary hearing was scheduled for May 11th, 2021. It was done over the phone as we were all under covid restrictions. As is usual in these cases, a couple of days before the hearing, the lawyers exchanged pre-hearing information. The day before the hearing, the attorney for the petitioner, not me, added letters from my daughter’s counselor and the joint counselor to the court papers. The dates on the letters were the day before the hearing, and the recipient of the letters was my daughter. These letters were asked for and created the day before the hearing. The body indicates that my daughter asked for them. I was not told these things beforehand or contacted to check on their validity before the letters were generated. There were no checks to see if anything being said was true. The letters were then passed along to the petitioner’s lawyer and sent to the court. So they were put into public record by the petitioner.
Please be advised of this parenting loophole in divorces. I am writing this so that all parents in NH know this. I did not know that this option even existed. To date, there have been no consequences for these actions. In fact, having our daughter ask for such letters has been a boon to the petitioner. From the time of the final hearing to the issuance of a final order, it was 6 months. So our case was under the temporary orders for a long time. Children may age out of the process because challenging anything takes enormous resources in both time and money. This is a dangerous precedent as it could open the door for children to be abused by adults in order to get what they want. In this case, a child was involved in the divorce to get an outcome from the court. It was then sanctioned by the judge saying this is OK to do. The consequences are enormous. Deals could be reached with children by parents in order to get what they want. Children could possibly be told what to say. Using this angle can give one party a decided advantage in a divorce to gain control over children, money, or any assets, or power of decision.
I want other parents to know what is going on in the court system so they are not surprised by this loophole the day before the hearing, like I was. That these are the code words that children can use to get letters from therapists. That this can all be done over email to therapists, as it was in this case. I did not authorize the letters’ release. Again, this is allowed the day before the hearing. This is so you will be prepared if this happens to you in the future or you are navigating this same landscape now. The people of NH need to know this. Parents are not supposed to be able to use their children in this way and the therapists, attorneys and judges are all supposed to be put in place to prevent this. Involving the children is now a strategy that can be put into effect by family law attorneys.
I do not know what power or responsibility the NH Supreme Court has in these cases or their ability to mete out consequences or make changes. But involving your children in the divorce was supposed to be against the rules here in NH. A child should not be used like this by adults. Please plan accordingly.
Roy Parker
Nashua, NH
